The AALL Spectrum
® Blog is published by the American Association of Law Libraries. Submissions from AALL members and other members of the legal community are highly encouraged. Opinions and editorial views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the official position of AALL. AALL does not assume any responsibility for statements advanced by contributors. The previous Spectrum
Blog was located at aallspectrum.wordpress.com
11/6/2014 4:49:14 PM
Gender and Sexuality in Information Studies Colloquium Recap
In mid-October I attended the Gender and Sexuality in Information Studies Colloquium at the University of Toronto. Papers were selected from proposals submitted in May of 2014. The conference was subject-specific and had an information science focus. I found it to be an excellent opportunity to connect with librarians practicing in non-legal areas, yet sharing a common interest. It was a great way to learn about new things and get a feel for other areas of the profession.
"Queering Order" Panel. Left to Right: Melodie Fox, Cait McKinney, D. Grant Campbell, & Melissa Adler.
The conference included presentations on a number of different subjects: web-based communities, internet filtration, archives, name authority records, Library of Congress subject headings, pornography, academic libraries, collections development, and art exhibits. All the works addressed gender or sexuality in some way. Two presentations focused on legal information as a key component, though many others also raised interesting legal questions. Melodie Fox, a doctoral candidate at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee iSchool provided and excellent analysis of legal classifications of sex and gender compared with gender classification in different editions of the Dewey Decimal System. My presentation focused on difficulties in researching asexuality in legal research databases and the resulting social justice implications.
In addition, inherent in several of the non-legal presentations were issues such as intellectual property protection for transient materials, harassment in digital creation spaces, and archiving hate crime material.
The conference was an excellent opportunity to learn about the roles that different individuals play in addressing contemporary library issues. “There were 100 attendees. [One attendee reporting on the conference estimated] that library and information studies professors and PhD students made up 50%, library school grad students made up 25%, and the other 25%. . .were practitioners, who work almost exclusively in academic settings.” Tara Robertson’s Blog. Attendance was higher than expected, but still small enough for presenters and attendees to meet and engage in discussion with individuals from institutions all over the continent.
A compilation of articles edited and compiled by the organizers of the conference, the Feminist and Queer Information Studies Reader, is available for those seeking more information on Gender and Sexuality in the library and information profession. In addition, many of the works presented at the conference will likely be published in the coming years.
© AJ Blechner, 2014. Reference/Outreach Librarian, University of Miami Law Library, Coral Gables, Florida. email@example.com.
Posted By 11/6/2014 4:49:14 PM
5/21/2014 4:59:06 PM
Book Review: A Call to Action: Women, Religion, Violence and Power
A Call to Action: Women, Religion, Violence and Power, by Jimmy Carter, 2014. Hardcover, 224 pages, $28.00 ISBN: 978-1476773957.
I’m grateful to Jimmy Carter for writing A Call to Action, which discusses the mistreatment of women around the world. The 224 page book contains chapters on unequal pay for women’s work, rape, human trafficking, “honor” killing, spousal abuse and other subjects. The value of the book for me lies in the clear explanation of each problem that women confront, statistics and details. Before I read the book, I knew something about most of the problems that Carter relates, but I didn’t fully understand the genesis of the abuses or how they are executed.
President Carter explains how the maltreatment of women is often justified by the scriptures of major religions and then debunks those justifications. In Carter’s eyes, unfair and violent/abusive treatment of women is the number one problem in the world today.
One reviewer of A Call to Action on Amazon.com remarks that the book would have been better if it had been written by a woman. I question that assertion, because Jimmy Carter displays a great deal of sensitivity and understanding in this resource. We women are lucky to have a champion like Carter, former President of the United States and winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. Few individuals have such stature and first-hand knowledge. President Carter has visited many nations around the world and discussed women’s issues with dignitaries and “average folks” alike. The book contains many extended quotations by experts.
The end of the book lists 23 actions that readers can pursue to advance the cause of women’s rights worldwide. I can’t recommend this book enough. It’s a “must” for anyone who cares about equality and fair treatment of women.
Author: Janet Lewis Reinke (firstname.lastname@example.org) is Head of Research Services at Florida International College of Law Library, Miami, Florida.
Posted By 5/21/2014 4:59:06 PM
3/26/2014 3:02:27 PM
Book Review. Gender & Justice: Why Women in the Judiciary Really Matter
Sally J. Kenney, Gender & Justice: Why Women in the Judiciary Really Matter. (New York: Routledge, 2013), ISBN: 978-0-415-88143-2 (hardcover), v + 310 pp. (incl. index), $109.48 (hardcover ); $31.75 (paperback) (Amazon pricing).
Justice must not only be done; it must be seen to be done.
Women make up 50% of law school graduates, yet few make it to the bench. Why? To ask a more provocative question: why does it matter? Despite assumptions to the contrary, women judges do not decide cases differently than men judges. So, if a woman’s presence on the bench doesn’t make a difference in case outcomes, why does it matter that women are missing?
Sally J. Kenney’s call-to-arms (written to an audience of her scholarly, feminist peers) analyzes women’s historical and current participation in U.S. federal and state courts, courts in the U.K., and in the European Court of Justice. Her exhaustive research reveals surprising patterns. First, women’s rise to the judiciary is not natural or inevitable despite the critical mass of women graduating from law school. There is no such thing as the “trickle-up” effect. Instead, a trifecta of phenomena must be present to result in a greater number of women on the bench: an explicit policy commitment to gender equality, influential “insiders” within a political organization or party, and outsiders (feminists) applying pressure. These phenomena were present in the U.S. when President Carter was in office (resulting in the appointment of forty women to the federal bench), but disappeared under the Reagan administration (leading to a reversal of women’s advancements as a group despite the appointment of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1981). Until last year, there was only one woman in all of the seven states of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals that had ever sat on the bench. And, at the U.S. state level, despite initial efforts to include women, the state supreme courts of Idaho and Iowa have reverted back to all-male courts. Women were not appointed to serve on the European Court of Justice prior to 1999 or as a Law Lord in England until 2002. Today, women remain underrepresented in these court systems as well, despite the large numbers of women lawyers “in the pipeline." The second pattern Kenney’s research reveals is: women’s progress unleashes rage. Women judges of every era have experienced frequent backlash, through explicit and implicit discrimination during the judicial selection process and while serving on the bench.
Despite a dreary past and an unsatisfying present, women have a hopeful future in the judiciary, according to Kenney, if feminists let go of arguments that focus on women’s differences from men and instead refocus on a strategy that worked when integrating the jury system: reframe representation as a right and duty of citizenship that gives the institution legitimacy. An African-American juror does not have to prove he would vote differently from a white juror to justify his presence in the jury. A Wisconsin judge doesn’t have to argue that he decides cases differently from an Illinois judge to justify his presence on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Likewise, women do not need to grasp at difference arguments to validate equal representation on the bench. In a democracy, the majority of the population cannot be excluded if the public is to regard the system as fair. Justice must not only be done; it must be seen to be done. Additionally, Kenney argues to shift the burden of proof. Feminists shouldn’t have to explain why the presence of women on the bench is necessary. Rather, those who wish to exclude women should explain what justifies their exclusion.
The appointments of Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court have reignited public and scholarly interest in women’s participation on the bench. Gender and Justice was one of several monographs on women in the judiciary published in 2013. It is essential reading for any feminist legal scholar as well as anyone laboring under the misapprehension that patience leads to progress.
Bottom Line: Recommended for academic law libraries.
Reviewed by: Loren Turner, Reference Librarian, University of Florida Levin College of Law.
 Except, to some extent, in sex discrimination cases.
 E.g., Elena Kagan: A biography by Meg Greene (Greenwood, 2013); Gender and Judging edited by Ulrike Schultz and Gisela Shaw (Hart Publishing, 2013); My Beloved World by Sonia Sotomayor (Knopf, 2013); Rebels at the Bar: The fascinating, forgotten stories of America’s first women lawyers by Jill Norgren (NYU Press, 2013); Women, Judging and the Judiciary: From difference to diversity by Erika Rackley (Routledge, 2013). Additionally, in November 2013, Volume 127 of the Harvard Law Review published a series of essays in honor of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg.
Posted By 3/26/2014 3:02:27 PM