|
AALL Washington Affairs Legislative and Regulatory Update 04/96
April 1996

Mary Alice Baish
Assistant Washington Affairs Representative
Georgetown University Law Library
111 G Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001
202/662-9200 *FAX:202/662-9202
Internet:baish@law.georgetown.edu
Legislative Branch Appropriations Hearings, FY 1997
The appropriations cycle begins anew. House appropriations
subcommittee hearings on the budget requests for the Joint
Committee on Printing (JCP), the Government Printing Office (GPO),
and the Library of Congress (LC) were held on March 5-6, 1996.
Committee chairman Ron Packard (R-CA) shared few hints of what we
might expect to see in terms of the FY 1997 funding levels for
either agency. Packard warned both Public Printer Michael DiMario
and Librarian of Congress James Billington that level funding would
be difficult as the Congress is committed to balancing the budget
in seven years. In his remarks to Billington, Packard noted that
LC had escaped cuts in FY 1996, the only legislative branch agency
to do so. The warning was not to expect the same to happen for the
next fiscal year. Packard did not state what the total amount of
legislative branch cuts for FY 1997 would be. Needless to say, any
substantial decrease in funding for either GPO or LC would have
dire consequences. As you may recall, the FY 1996 goal of reducing
legislative branch costs by $200,000,000 was achieved by Congress,
but among the cuts was the elimination of the Office of Technology
Assessment (OTA).
The Joint Committee on Printing
Chairman Bill Thomas (R-CA) touted the fact that the JCP,
having downsized staff by half, returned $434,000 of its 1995
appropriations to the U.S. Treasury. Significant savings were also
made by reducing by about one-third the number of publications sent
to House members' offices, including the Congressional Record and
the Congressional Directory. Thomas also commented very positively
on the fact that GPO had reduced their losses from $21.7 million in
FY 1994 to $3 million in FY 1995.
He reiterated that the JCP should be eliminated and that its
oversight functions should be shifted to the House Oversight and
Senate Rules and Administration Committees. One of Thomas' first
acts as the new chairman of the JCP last year, that was met with a
contentious revolt by the Senate members, was his attempt to
eliminate the committee. Following Thomas' statement at this
hearing, Rep. Ray Thornton (D-ARK) submitted for the record a
letter from Sen. John Warner (D-VA) stating that the JCP should not
be eliminated as it serves a very important oversight function.
The letter cited the National Technical Information Service (NTIS),
the Department of Labor, and the Defense Printing Service as
agencies whose printing operations have bypassed GPO and thus, the
Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP). Warner also announced
his plans, as chairman of Senate Rules and Administration, to hold
hearings on Title 44 possibly as early as late March. We should
regard this as a positive sign and perhaps a strategy to assure
that any changes to the FDLP will properly emanate from the
authorizing committees rather than appropriations. Also, at last
August's GPO hearing before the House Oversight Committee, Chairman
Thomas mentioned that the committee would likely hold spring
hearings following the release of the GPO Study which is due to
Congress by the end of March.
At one point during his testimony, Thomas made it clear that
the elimination of the JCP is not just his own personal goal but
the wish of the majority leadership. At one point, he noted that
libraries could (his tone inferred "easily") download and print
documents for circulation to the public. Thomas has signaled this
message before and he seems to take it for granted that the
responsibility and costs of printing documents will be shifted to
libraries and users. Despite the overall nature and tone of his
remarks, Thomas ended on a positive note regarding the transition
to a more electronic FDLP. He stated that he prefers to aim for an
overly ambitious timeframe for the transition but that it is more
important to "get it right."
The Government Printing Office
Rep. Packard commended DiMario for the development of the
Transition Plan that recommends a rapid shift to a "predominately"
electronic FDLP. DiMario stated that GPO is requesting level
funding of $30.8 million for the FY 1997 Salaries and Expenses
Appropriations of the Superintendent of Documents. An additional
$500,000 was requested for technology grants to assist depository
libraries and $20,000 to offer training sessions around the
country. DiMario said that in retrospect GPO realizes that the
Transition Plan is too ambitious. The plan was released in
December for broad public comment, and both agencies and the
library community have expressed serious concerns about the
timeframe and the lack of data to support its proposals. DiMario
mentioned that a 5-7 year plan had been suggested as being more
realistic but Packard discouraged any notion of prolonging the
transition beyond two years. DiMario replied that the transition
must be based on the technological capabilities of agencies and
libraries.
Regarding the technology grants, Packard remarked that these
could be a disincentive to local community support for libraries.
He also brought up the issue of the LC study, also mandated by last
year's appropriations bill, that makes recommendations towards
developing a consolidated access system for all legislative
information. The fact that both agencies were mandated to carry
out different studies this past year, and that the two agencies
obviously do not regularly communicate with one another, was noted
as quite problematic. Packard urged cooperation between LC and GPO
in order to reduce any duplication between the GPO ACCESS and
THOMAS systems.
The Library of Congress
Having been warned by Packard of the slim chances of getting
level funding for FY 1997, Dr. Billington expressed his fear that
the effects of a reduced LC budget would be impossible to reverse.
LC requested $373 million for FY 1997, a 5.8 increase necessary to
fund mandatory salary increases, provide continuity for many
programs, and target strategic activities such as electronic
initiatives and collection security measures. LC unveiled a very
polished video for the subcommittee members that did a nice job of
highlighting the Law Library and the Global Legal Information
Network (GLIN), the Copyright Office and the National Digital
Library.
There was an important discussion regarding the proposal to
move the Copyright Office to the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO).
Both Dr. Billington and Register of Copyrights Marybeth Peters
emphasized that this would have a devastating effect on LC's
collection of both published and unpublished works. This
legislative proposal (S. 1458) is particularly troublesome since
Vice President Gore just this week announced the NPR recommendation
to change both the PTO and NTIS to "performance-based
organizations," i.e. government corporations. On another matter,
Packard asked Dr. Billington whether the Congressional Research
Service (CRS) had picked up any OTA functions; the answer was no,
that CRS has a very limited capacity to deal with long-range
studies. A brief discussion about the THOMAS/GPO ACCESS overlap
followed, with Packard once more urging better cooperation between
the two agencies. His words did not fall on deaf ears, as within
a day of this hearing Billington and DiMario had scheduled a
meeting to discuss how THOMAS, GPO ACCESS and the Congressional
information service might be consolidated.
Joint Library Association Statements
Chairman Packard was the only committee member present on the
second day of the hearing when outside witnesses presented their
statements. The hearing opened with comments from Rep. Vernon
Ehlers (R-MI) who is overseeing House computerization efforts. He
emphasized the importance of highly trained personnel and adequate
resources. He said that the long-term result of the House
Information Resources (HIR) system would be improved efficiencies
and cost savings, but that it takes a significant up-front
investment and ever-continuing costs to keep up with new
technologies. Ehlers also stressed the need for standardization
and centralization. As we listened to his statement, we were
hopeful that the problems and expenses that he described relating
to the development of the HIR would be carried over to the
perspective of libraries and end-users.
Dr. Betty J. Turock, President of the American Library
Association, presented testimony on behalf of ALA, AALL and the
Association of Research Libraries (ARL) in support of both the LC
and GPO budget requests. To backtrack just a bit, the principal
library associations have served in an advisory role to the GPO
study working group since last fall. On February 23, 1996 we sent
a letter to Public Printer DiMario on behalf of AALL, ALA, ARL, the
Medical Library Association and the Special Libraries Association.
In it we raised several serious concerns regarding the Transition
Plan, chief among them whether the ambitious two-year timeframe
could be efficiently achieved. Underlying many of our concerns
also is the fact that the plan was developed without benefit of
concrete data to support its basic assumptions and provisions. The
key points of Turock's statement at this hearing, already raised in
the letter to the Public Printer, were that:
The technological infrastructure necessary to support the
nearly all electronic FDLP described in the Transition Plan does
not yet exist.
The two-year timeframe is too ambitious and does not take
into account the current capabilities and readiness of GPO,
agencies, depository and other libraries, or users.
Government information should be made available in the most
usable format, including print, to best meet the informational
needs of the American public.
A change to a more electronic program must take into account
the entire life cycle of information--from its creation to its
long-term access and preservation.
Before implementing this shift to a nearly all electronic
FDLP, the government must ensure the authenticity and integrity of
electronic government information so that users know that the
information is "official."
The Transition Plan must ensure incentives so that libraries
will be able to continue participation in the FDLP.
The government must ensure that Americans in every
Congressional district will continue to have access to electronic
government information in depository libraries.
And last but not least, that the move to a predominately
electronic FDLP may jeopardize the cooperative International
Exchange Program through which the Library of Congress, and
particularly the Law Library, receive important foreign government
publications.
Dr. Turock's written and oral statements hopefully served to
shed some light on the complexities and multiple uses of federal
information. She emphasized that libraries have always been in the
forefront of technological change and committed to providing access
to the broad and growing array of electronic products and services.
She noted that information is of value, however, only when it is
used, put to work in a real-life situation. Library investments
were also stressed since our institutions must continue to maintain
print collections while investing heavily in equipment, connections
and support for electronic access.
Turock concluded her comments by stating that any and all
changes to the FDLP must maximize the efficiencies of an electronic
program with the guarantees of broader, more equitable, and long-
term public access to federal information. Following her
statements, Packard had only one brief question regarding the
technology grants. Although we did not learn the extent of the
budget cuts for FY 1997, we undoubtedly have a herculean task ahead
of us in terms of educating members of Congress on the above
issues. As the appropriations process continues, we may well need
your grassroots support. Packard at one point did ask Mr. DiMario
whether users of depository libraries were complaining about the
transition to a more electronic program. We must be prepared to do
just that if cuts are proposed that would curtail the public's
right to timely, equitable, efficient and no-fee government
information. As always, the documents mentioned in this column--
the joint letter to the Public Printer and the statements in
support of the LC and GPO budget requests--are available on
Aaallnet.
Late Breaking News:
Members of the Consortium of Law Schools Receieve James Madison Honoary Citations
© 1996, American Association of Law Libraries
|