|
SCENARIO # 8: PRIVATE
- LAW FIRM LIBRARY AS KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT CENTER
Rationale
As the practice of law evolves, law firms
grow, and client demands change, it has become evident that
the need for firms to manage the intellectual capital within
their organizations has become imperative. Law librarians
have been working in knowledge management (KM) through organization
of both internal and external knowledge for years. It follows
that the library would be the department within the firm to
take on the responsibility of managing that intellectual capital
through KM.
Vision
The law firm library has become the center
for knowledge management within the organization. Library
staff work with practice groups to facilitate the sharing
of knowledge within and among the groups. Besides working
with the groups to develop non-technical initiatives, the
staff also works on developing technologically driven systems
that allow knowledge sharing. These systems are web based
and accessed via the firm's intranet. In this scenario, the
library moves beyond the boundaries of what a library is defined
as today and operates as a leader within the organization
in support of the practices.
Implications/strategies for library
areas
- Facilities (See
the all electronic library scenario for additional information
regarding facilities).
Space is needed for additional staff members
who are dedicated to KM. The facilities include offices
that allow KM staff and librarians to meet with individuals
and small groups for planning sessions. KM initiatives also
require state of the art computers and a network with high
speed Internet access.
- Collections/content
Content for KM initiatives includes the following:
- Information stored in databases throughout
the firm (Outlook, Elite, Interaction, HR database,
etc.) that, when put in context via the firm's intranet,
become knowledge.
- Databases that are created specifically
to contain knowledge (i.e., Research database that tracks
reference/research requests).
- Prior work product stored in the firm's
document management system.
- External information resources used
to develop knowledge regarding clients, legal issues,
etc. These services can be primary or secondary legal
resources, news resources, public records, etc.
- Staffing
Additional staffing is generally needed to
support KM initiatives. This staff is knowledgeable about
the practice of law and the technology used to manage knowledge.
The staffing may be different depending on the size of the
firm and the KM initiatives being undertaken by the firm
and may be outsourced depending on need. Skills needed by
library staff or provided through partnering with other
departments within the firm or by outsourcing include:
- The ability to lead the firm in the
visioning process that needs to take place in order
to move forward with KM. It requires high leadership
aptitude with a high degree of skill in communication,
problem solving, change management and negotiation/collaboration.
- The technical skills needed to develop
resources/systems for knowledge sharing. Since the intranet
is the central resource for KM in the firm, technical
skills are necessary for the development process of
the various systems that come out of the KM initiatives.
Along with technical skills, skill in communication,
project management, and systems thinking are also required.
- The ability to lead in the evaluation,
implementation and training of electronic resources.
The skill in evaluation of user interfaces and content,
along with experience in training and performing research
are also required.
- The ability to act as KM consultant
during KM initiatives as well as provide services as
research librarians, trainers, and content/collection
developers.
o A full understanding of the firm's practices and the
support needed within each practice area.
- Services
The services consist of individual KM initiatives
that result in database systems/online collections available
via the intranet/extranet that are managed by library staff.
Examples of such collections include:
- Attorney work product retrieval system
- Attorney expertise system
- Expert witness database
- Judges biographical database
- Local counsel database
- Client/matter resource
- Intranet practice group page
- Intranet research page
- Current awareness service
- CLE support
- Training
The library as knowledge center requires
library staff to develop skills in several areas. Besides
the need to stay current in their specific areas of expertise,
they include leadership, communication, negotiation, change
management, marketing, content evaluation, user interface
evaluation, technical know-how (networks, web-coding, portals,
etc.), and training adult users.
- Budget
Knowledge management is expensive. Besides
the increase in staffing costs, expect the following in
the way of costs:
- The cost of space for additional staff.
- The cost of lawyer time as they work
on non-billable KM initiatives.
- The expense of KM software as needed.
At the same time, the firm should realize
cost savings as attorneys and staff use the resources developed
to provide client support.
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
- Increases access to the firm's intellectual
capital
- Increases the effectiveness of the individual
practice groups
- Enhances consistency and quality of service
to the firm's clients
Weaknesses
- Increases requirements for new technology
tools
- Increases cost of total operation
- Higher salaried staff
- Electronic materials more expensive
- New technology tools come with cost
- The library staff may not have the credibility
needed to implement a successful KM initiative if they do
not have a law degree.
- Requires champion who may not be present
within the firm.
Opportunities
- Strengthen relationships with attorney
practice areas
- Increase technical proficiency
- Develop communication and marketing skills
- Develop expertise in particular practice
areas
- The information professional is seen as
a leader within the organization.
- Provides recognition opportunity.
Threats
- Chances of failure are high if the firm's
leaders do not support
- There may be competition for control within
administrative departments and/or practice groups.
|