|
SCENARIO #9: STATE, COURT
& COUNTY - TRULY PUBLIC LAW LIBRARY
Rationale
Functioning as a branch of the public library
system, a department within the judicial branch, or an independent
public law library, these libraries share the mission of providing
public access to a wide range of legal materials and court
documents, both print and electronic. As each state's judiciary
invests more of their budget in the development of services
and court assistance programs for the public, the public law
library has become a significant partner in the delivery of
justice. Relying on regional repository libraries to maintain
archival print collections, the librarians at these libraries
are familiar with the best resources for meeting the needs
of the self-represented litigants, members of the general
public and the judiciary.
As documented in a number of surveys conducted
in early 2000, the number of attorneys using public law libraries
is decreasing. With a corresponding increase in the depth
and breadth of materials available in an electronic format
at an affordable price, the attorney now accesses most, if
not all, legal resources online. Those public law libraries
relying on a membership subscription base must find new ways
to provide alternative and/or remote services to retain this
user population. At the same time, the number of lay users
is increasing, including a dramatic rise in the number of
self-represented litigants. Interestingly, this growing group
of law library users requires more assistance and training
than that previously provided to attorneys using public law
libraries and affects the format and content of public law
library collections.
Vision
Located in the courthouse or municipal library
facility, these public law libraries offer large open spaces
permitting easy access to computer workstations and library
staff. Using a variety of formats and techniques, law librarians
provide ongoing educational programming for library users,
including the judiciary and the public. The librarians' time
may be dedicated to completing in-depth legal research for
solo practitioners who, despite ease of access, don't have
time to come to the library or complete the research at their
own desktop. For the self-represented litigant, the librarian
is ready to assist as they navigate a range of library materials,
both print and electronic.
Implications/Strategies
Facilities:
- Blend of electronic and print legal resources
requires less shelf space and more electronic workstations
- "Hot line" to regional repository
law libraries for access to many print and archival materials
is centrally located in the library
- Computer workstations dedicated to preparation
and filing of court documents
Collections:
- Wide range of access to online electronic
resources
- Limited print collections consists of primary
law for the locality and legal materials prepared for the
layperson
- Court forms, including necessary instructions
- Emphasis on "how-to" titles written
for the layperson
- Basic materials available in multiple languages
and large print formats
Staffing:
- Fewer staff for technical services functions
because there are fewer materials to process
- Majority of staff working in public service
and training
- Strong oral and written communication skills
necessary for teaching
- Strong customer service orientation
- Basic conversational skills in other languages
Services:
- Ongoing basic legal research training sessions
for self-represented litigants, such as monthly in-house
seminars on a variety of legal topics
- Ongoing instruction in use of electronic
products, including self-serve kiosks
- Interlibrary loan services for access to
print materials housed at regional repositories
- Providing coordinated "virtual"
legal reference services with public and state libraries
- Partnering with courthouse legal assistance
programs
Training:
- Professional development addressing licensing
issues inherent in the acquisition of electronic access
vs. ownership
- Workshops focusing on teaching and training
adult learners
Budget:
- As a partner with the court and community
in providing equal access to the legal system, these libraries
are funded via state and local appropriation
SWOT Analysis
Strengths:
- Public law libraries are already positioned
to serve the public's information needs
- Better, more efficient use of limited library
space to provide legal information
Weaknesses:
- Loss of some print collections = less-timely
access to older legal information
- Dependence on other libraries to maintain
and preserve legal materials
- Increased reliance on providing information
via electronic access requires more expertise re: licensing
issues
Opportunities
- Partnerships with local judiciary and bar
increase awareness and support of the library's mission
- Collaborative approach to providing legal
assistance is more beneficial for the public
- Establishing cooperative collection access
with other law libraries strengthens relationships with
colleagues
Threats:
- Perception that the law library requires
much less funding since there are fewer books to process
and fewer attorneys using the library collection
- Inability to negotiate online access contracts
for public access and/or inconsistent vendor policies re:
public access to online databases
- In some states, unauthorized practice of
law rules and policies may restrict the levels of service
librarians are able to offer
|