AALL Annual Meeting & Conference
Annual Meeting Home
Programs and Workshops
Calls for Great Ideas
Make Your Case
While You're There
Schedule and Overview
Maximize Your Experience
Information for Exhibitors
Ordering A/V Equipment
Ordering Food and Beverage
Meetings and Functions
Bloomberg Law (Gold)
HBR Consulting (Bronze)
Thomson Reuters (Gold)
William S. Hein & Co., Inc. (Bronze)
Wolters Kluwer (Gold)
Chapter and SIS VIPs
Recommendations for Developing a Great Proposal
Set realistic goals and fully develop your proposal.
Think about solutions to workplace challenges, and practical tools and ideas that attendees can apply once they're back to work. Explore the
"must-have" program topics
for Chicago (coming soon), and consider the hot topics buzzing around your SIS or chapter.
Go beyond the "sage on a stage." Think creatively about
, especially about ways to encourage attendees to work together to share experiences, brainstorm, or solve a problem.
Be clear and concise with your
. Keep in mind that your most critical reader may be a law firm CEO, law school administrator, or court administrator trying to decide whether or not to let your potential audience member attend. Please try to keep your description to fewer than 100 words.
The standard program length for the 2016 conference is
, so think about the best way to deliver the content of your program in that time frame. (There is also the option to propose longer length deep dive programs [2.5 hours] and preconference workshops, which can range from half a day up to two days in length.)
who are the best individuals to present and/or lead discussions on the issue. If your subject matter expert is not necessarily a dynamic presenter, pair him/her with an energetic moderator who can keep the session moving.
Carefully consider the
number of speakers
you want on the program or workshop. Having more than three speakers on a one-hour program is strongly discouraged.
for help if you need it.
Plan ahead; give yourself plenty of time to make revisions and corrections. The AMPC will evaluate all submitted proposals using a
focusing on: 1) the relevance of the topic (Is it important, timely, and vital to legal information professionals? Will the learner be able to implement some action or think in new ways as a result?); and 2) its description (Is it clear and well-defined? Is there a specific plan for learner engagement? Are the proposed speakers suitable?).
Review and revise your proposal – be a careful editor – and share it with colleagues.
Submit your proposal online
by the deadline – October 6!
Inside Information for Program Proposers
Needs Assessment Findings