[Prodev] Prodev Making (or Keeping) Your Library Relevant
Rosalie Sanderson
prodev@aallnet.org
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:01:55 -0500
Good morning!
Hope that our technical problems are behind us today! If you have
any continuing trouble receiving either blank messages or
messages with html problems, please contact Mary Jawgiel at
AALL headquarters at mjawgiel@aall.org
BENCHMARKS
Yesterday we began with a look at benchmarks of relevance in
today's law library. Carol Bannen of a Milwaukee law firm library
reported that she benchmarks on her library's successes by
keeping STATISTICS including numbers of billable hours, numbers
of requests, numbers of classes taught, and hits on intranet and
internet library resources.
Roseanne Shea of a Stamford CT law firm library reported that
relevant services that kept attorneys coming back to her library
were making access to information easy and faster than otherwise
available.
A report from Kim Deniker of the Mercer County Law Library in
Pennsylvania indicated that COMMUNICATION was a critical part
of being relevant in her library. She communicated information
about new products and services and she actively asked for
feedback about these products and services. Kim mentioned that
her users were so diverse in the local bar that she found it
necessary to offer a range of both print and electronic products to
meet the range of user demands.
Today, I'd like to hear from more of you about the following:
1) What is/are your most relevant service(s) and product today(s)?
2) Is it different from the most relevant service and product 2 years
ago? 5 years ago?
More than 300 people are signed up on this list. Please don't be
shy. Take the time to write a short response. I'd like to hear from
librarians in all types of libraries.relevant services and products. It
will be interesting to compare the results.
Rosalie M. Sanderson
New York Law School
57 Worth Street, LB 11
New York, NY 10013
V: 212-431-2897
F: 212-963-8839
mailto:rsanderson@nyls.edu