The discussion was based on participant's questions and concerns. We discussed the training for journal editors and staff, circulation, and policy issues. Two interesting ideas came out for ensuring students came to training: taking the editors to lunch and only granting extended circulation privileges to those who have taken training. It seems like for every school there was a different set of circulation policies. One school gives each article a patron record. At another school, the article editor is responsible for checking out materials for cite checking. One policy issue that came up was whether to do interlibrary loans for cite checking purposes (or have the editors go back to the author). In our discussion of handling ILL for law journals, we learned that many libraries require journal students to visit local libraries to retrieve items before they will initiate an ILL. A few libraries did not require this and were willing to ILL items from a local library. We also learned that some libraries are allotting special space within the library (shelves or offices) to keep items checked out to the journals. Other libraries continue to check materials out to individual carrels. There was some concern raised over the privacy of patron records when libraries attempt to streamline the checkout process for journals. These were just a few of the interesting ideas that were shared.