Report of the
AALL Representative to the American Library Association
Association for Library Collection and Technical Services
Cataloging and Classification Section
Subject Analysis Committee (SAC)
Midwinter Meeting, San Diego, January 2011
Annual Meeting, New Orleans, June 2011

Yael Mandelstam
Fordham Law School Library
ymandelstam [at] law.fordham.edu

This report marks the end of my second and final term as the AALL representative to SAC. I find it difficult to believe that six years have passed so fast! I very much enjoyed these stimulating and productive years and plan to remain active on the SAC Subcommittee on Genre/Form Implementation. I wish my successor Ellen McGrath the best of luck and am looking forward to her reports.

Following is a summary of SAC activities in 2011 and highlights from the Library of Congress ALA reports.

Two SAC subcommittees were disbanded at ALA Annual: the SAC Subcommittee on FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) and the SAC Faceting Task Force. Issues regarding faceting will continue to be discussed at the new Faceted Subject Access Interest Group of the ALCTS Cataloging and Classification Section (recently renamed Cataloging and Metadata Management Section).

Preconference on Genre/Form

SAC sponsored an ALA Annual preconference called What is it, anyway? Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms for Library and Archival Materials. The workshop introduced participants to the principles and application of Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms for Library and Archival Materials (LCGFT). Janis Young, the LC Genre/Form Coordinator at LC Policy and Standards Division (PSD), covered the theoretical and practical aspects of LCGFT; Beth Iseminger from Harvard University spoke about the music genre/form project at the Music Library Association (MLA); and I spoke about the development of the law genre/form terms at AALL.

SAC Subcommittee on Genre/Form Implementation

Shortly before ALA Annual, the SAC Subcommittee on Genre/Form Implementation approved the recommendations of the 185/155 Working Group. The group was formed in 2010 and charged with reviewing all current LCSH form subdivisions in 185 authority records and identifying terms of general applications that could be recommended for inclusion in the LCGFT. The group's recommendations were submitted to SAC and if approved, will be submitted to PSD.

The subcommittee has also been working on possible treatments of various "facets" or "aspects" associated with genre/form terms (since subdivisions are not allowed in LCGFT). Facets include class of creator and intended audience (e.g., gender, occupation, age group, ethnicity, nationality) as well as place, language, religious denomination, etc. Each member of the subcommittee prepared a report on one or more of these aspects, and the reports and potential recommendations were discussed at ALA Annual. The subcommittee will continue its discussions electronically and hopes to submit its recommendations to SAC by ALA Midwinter.

SAC Subcommittee on RDA

This new subcommittee was formed at ALA Midwinter to address subject-related issues in RDA. The Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC) is moving forward with the subject-related chapters of RDA and it was important to set in place a mechanism for ALA to respond to JSC proposals and papers, since subject analysis issues are not under the purview of the Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access (CC:DA), and SAC is not formally charged to respond to the JSC. To resolve this issue ALCTS created the new position of a SAC liaison to CC:DA (who also acts as chair of the SAC Subcommittee on RDA). SAC will be the decision-making body for formulating the ALA responses, and the decisions will be communicated to CC:DA.

SAC and CC:DA members and liaison had a joint meeting at ALA Annual. John Attig, the ALA representative to JSC, gave a presentation about subject entities and relationships in RDA, and Gordon Dunsire spoke about the treatment of subject in each of the Functional Requirements models: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) and Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD). Following the presentations was a brief discussion of the LC discussion paper on the "placeholder" chapters in RDA for Group 3 entities (Concept, Object, Event, and Place) and "subject".

Highlights from reports submitted by Janis Young, the liaison from the Library of Congress Policy and Standards Division.

The full LC at ALA report is available at http://www.loc.gov/ala

SUBJECT CATALOGING AND CLASSIFICATION

GENRE/FORM TERMS