AALL Home TS/SIS Home OBS/SIS Home TSLL Home Index Icon returns you to this page.

TSLL Caption Graphic

Volume 24, No. 3
March 1999
http://www.aallnet.org/sis/tssis/tsll/tsll.htm
ISSN: 0195-4857

INSIDE: 
Staff / Officers / Deadlines

From the Officers:
OBS-SIS
TS-SIS

Articles
Program Selection
Digital Preservation
Using LCC for International
   Legal Materials
Oh No - A Board Game?
Annual Meeting

Columns:
Acquisitions
Classification
Collection Development
Internet
OBS OCLC Committee
Research & Publications
Serials
Subject Headings

Reports
ALA ALCTS/CCS

Parting Thoughts
TS-SIS Survey Summary
TS-SIS Survey on TSLL
From the Editors
Winners

Computer holding books up
The Black Hole in Annual Program Selection

Anne Myers
Boston University
amyers@bu.edu
Women reading book

There is a black hole for most AALL members in the annual meeting program selection process: that period between the deadline for submitting a program proposal and the date you are notified whether or not your proposal was accepted. This year I had a chance to sit inside that black hole as a member of the Annual Meeting Program Selections Committee (AMPSC). I learned a lot about what I, at least, saw during the proposal review process and thought that others might find some of it useful in preparing proposals in the future. Please bear in mind that I speak for myself only, not for AMPSC or AALL, and that procedures and processes change over time.

Having said that, let me also say a little about what we did before entering the "black hole" period. All AMPSC members were assigned to be liaisons to multiple SIS's, chapters, caucuses, and other interest groups. We were charged with helping groups know about the program theme and proposal deadlines, made sure they all had copies of the Program Planners Handbook (which we also revised), and worked with them to help clarify questions or issues to be considered. My liaison assignments included both the Technical Services and Online Bibliographic Services SIS's, and I sat in with their education committees during the annual meeting as program ideas were discussed.

Once proposals were turned in, however, it was time to change hats and become a member of AMPSC, charged with looking at all of the programs submitted. And there were a lot of them! Approximately two weeks after the submission deadline, each committee member received a big black notebook with 170 program proposals, 17 workshop proposals, and indexes to the above done every which-way (by proposer, SIS, broad topic, length of time, format, etc.). We had one week to read, review, and rank proposals. Our responses were then sent to headquarters and compiled into more lists that we used during our selection meeting in September.   [continued...]

Newsletter of the Technical Services Special Interest Section and the
On-Line Bibliographic Services Special Interest Section of the American Association of Law Libraries


AALL Home TS/SIS Home OBS/SIS Home TSLL Home Index Icon returns you to this page.

Comments to: WebMaster, tssis@law.wuacc.edu
Updated: March 29, 1999.
URL: http://www.aallnet.org/sis/tssis/tsll/24-03/24-03.htm