The AALL Spectrum
® blog is published by the American Association of Law Libraries. Submissions from AALL members and other members of the legal community are highly encouraged. Opinions and editorial views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the official position of AALL. AALL does not assume any responsibility for statements advanced by contributors. Previously, the AALL Spectrum
Blog was located at aallspectrum.wordpress.com
The AALL Spectrum blog is no longer published. Previous posts are archived on this page.
8/1/2012 4:30:37 PM
Session J5: Class KIA-KIX: A Revolutionary New Classification Schedule for the 21st Century
At AALL’s Annual Meeting 2012, Dr. Jolande E. Goldberg of LC and George Prager of NYU presented on the recent changes to the law classification schedules dealing with the Law of Indigenous Peoples in the Americas (KIA-KIX). Dr. Goldberg developed the schedule with two goals in mind. First, she wanted to organize indigenous legal materials at LC in a more coherent manner. Second, she wanted to give access to a critical mass of primary and secondary resources available on the web.
To achieve the first goal, 1200 tribal law materials were gathered from several areas of LC to test the new schedule. These included tribal codes, reporters, session laws, corporate charters, constitutions, by-laws, and much more. Some were previously located in KF (United States) or KE (Canada), some were never reclassified from Thomas Jefferson’s original classification scheme, and some were never classified at all. During the test they were reclassified into the new KIA-KIX range. The new schedule allows for better granularity, as each tribe has its own series of call numbers. Previously all 560+ tribes shared one call number, KF8228.
The second goal expands the use of the LC Classification Schedule to include links to sources of tribal law. A bibliography of legal materials with those links will be ordered in the same hierarchical structure as the KIA-KIX schedule. Dr. Goldberg explained that there are limited sources of tribal legal materials available. She and her colleagues researched many of those materials for the project and wanted to share those findings in one central bibliography. While the final location is unknown, the current draft of the bibliography along with a new guide explaining the project can be found at http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/kia_intro.html.
The new schedule is in the final stages of completion, with official release expected within the next year. Future updates may be listed under the “News” section of the Cataloging and Acquisitions Homepage at http://www.loc.gov/aba/.
Posted By 8/1/2012 4:30:37 PM
8/1/2012 4:24:23 PM
"I was gonna clean my [hotel] room until I got high. I gonna get up and find the [AALL member services’] broom but then I got high. My room is still messed up and I know why (Yeah, hey!)/ Because I got high, because I got high, because I got high." Well, not exactly. Afroman may have sung about getting high, but Jaye Anne Barlous and Kelly Reynolds are the research experts on the subject.
So why weed? These two librarians stumbled into a hot topic that the students really loved to research. Kelly Reynolds started the session yesterday with a bit of context for using this subject in teaching. Basically, she found that the subject grabbed student attention, and also fit very well into the research world. Those opportunities are few and far between for research instructors. For these librarians researching medical marijuana provided a plethora of research “ah-ha” moments. For example, for Kelly it is a “Boolean Dream,” because you have to use wild card characters for a comprehensive search (marijuana v. marihuana = mari*uana). Also, researching medical marijuana is very Google-adverse, because almost every high school student has written a paper on the subject then posted it online. Thus, you, as the teacher, have the opportunity to discuss how to evaluate sources for credibility. And of course, if you’re open to the public, this will be an inevitable reference question.
Planting the seed. Kelly moved from the legal research classroom to the garden to give us a bit of background on the plant. I learned that the marijuana plant is an annual that grows 13 to 18 feet tall and blooms late summer to early fall. Typically, the plant grows 1 to 11 leaflets. It is a dioecious plant, which means that it’s reproductive organs are on different plants. Hemp comes from the stem (ropes and clothing) of the male marijuana plant. The issue is with the flowering female (pollinated). From this plant you can create hashish and by drying its leaves you can form the marijuana that is smoked. Cool.
Reaping the fields. So then Kelly explained “we have receptors in our brain and our brain that cannabis stimulates.” These receptors impact various parts of our body including dopamine, dopamine receptors, reproduction, memory, and even temperature. Medical cannabis has been used to relieve the symptoms of many illnesses, such as AIDS wasting and anorexia (generating an appetite), chemotherapy-induced nausea, glaucoma (pain relief), and Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity. However, the use of marijuana is not symptom free, and there are side effects specific to using medical marijuana. Those include, cognitive impairment, hallucinations, anxiety, early onset psychosis, dependence, and death (yes, there is a lethal limit to marijuana which equates to 30,000 joints = THC limit).
Selling your crops. I have found that the perfect storm for research questions are those that hit every field of law – international, federal, state and administrative – Kelly confirmed that inclination yesterday. Medicinal use of marijuana is one of those complex legal questions that require research in each sector. For example, there is a treaty directly on point with this topic titled the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs created to regulate research-grade marijuana that is produced and sold internationally between research institutions. But, research-grade marijuana is also regulated by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), which requires domestic marijuana obtained within the country to comply with the U.S. Code and the regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), available at http:grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not99-091.htm. What an awesome intersection between international law and domestic law! These speakers did an amazing job detailing the history of marijuana in the legal in the legal field, both through legislative history and common law development.
The purpose of the plant. The second part of the session was on the use of marijuana in media to promote racial basis leading to unethical decision-making by our government. Jaye Barlous brought an interesting dynamic to the controversy of marijuana over the years by following the historical trail of newspaper and popular culture references. She took us through a look at marijuana in movies and films that displayed the use of marijuana with many violent crimes! One piece of the propaganda even included a shot of a lady being injected with the marijuana drug.
If you want to generate a conversation on ethical decision-making at the legislative level, look to the use of racism in the development of the laws and media surrounding marijuana. For example, by 1937, every state had adopted some form of marijuana regulating law. In 1937, the Marijuana Tax Act was enacted. That being said, imagine creating a legislative history assignment that looks at the testimony before the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Re. 75th Congress on HI 6385 in April 1937 where the speaker refers solely to newspaper articles. Continue that thought in that these articles were never substantiated. Strikingly though, his testimony was entered into the legislative history record as part of the purpose for enacting the law, which will then construct the legislative intent for courts to reference. This behavior is clearly shocking and appalling unethical behavior in our legislative process. To the contrary though, Dr. William C. Woodward, who acknowledged the addictive nature of marijuana, provided an opposing view that looked at the evaluation of the commentary previously provided. He noted that this testimony was based on news articles and the speaker provided no component primary evidence. Jaye found that this aspect of medical marijuana compounded into a discussion that challenged traditional notions that government should have best interest of the people. Conversely, in dealing with medical marijuana over the years, by conducting legislative history research, you find that there are many distinct unethical actions that have been found on racially-based motives to regulating this plant and industry.
Posted By 8/1/2012 4:24:23 PM
7/18/2012 2:30:20 PM
Book Review - The Economics of Remedies
The Economics of Remedies (Economic Approaches to Law), edited by Ariel Porat. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2012. Hardcover, 674 pages, $330.00.
The latest book in publisher Edward Elgar’s Economic Approaches to Law series follows the same general format of previous volumes. It is a collection of leading articles on a topic. They are selected, arranged and introduced by a scholar in the field. In this case, the scholar is Ariel Porat, professor of law at both Tel Aviv University and University of Chicago. He has published several books and articles, in both English and Hebrew, on a variety of topics related to the law of remedies. In this volume, Porat brings together 18 articles spanning 40 years of scholarship on the topic of the economics of remedies related to tort and/or contract law. As one would expect from an editor with Porat’s impressive credentials, these articles are well chosen and, according to Google Scholar, have been heavily cited to since their initial publication. They are the “greatest hits” on the subject of the economics of remedies. As such, they are readily available from their original sources and are most likely already accessible, albeit separately, in many law libraries. Large academic libraries may want to purchase the book for the use of scholars who will find it to be a convenient collection. However, due to the lack of original content, I cannot recommend it for most libraries.
The book begins with an introduction by Porat. In it, he explains the scope and content of the book. In choosing articles, Porat sought a diversity of authors, preferred a more informal tone and a general rather than detailed approach to the topics presented. These editorial choices ensure the articles can be understood by a larger audience and are applicable to wide variety of discussions about remedies. The book is organized into five sections that are briefly outlined in the introduction. The first section contains four articles about property and liability rules. The concept of efficient breach is addressed next. The four articles in the second section discuss damages versus specific performance. The third and fourth sections cover the issues of the measure of recovery and the scope of liability, respectively. The fifth and final section contains two articles, including the editor’s own, on the topic of partial compensation. The articles themselves follow this tidy introduction. They are exact reprints and retain their original pagination. Then the book ends.
Turning the last page of this hefty volume, I was surprised by the abrupt ending. I expected more. There is no index. There are no appendices or tables. Other than the brief (8 page) introduction, there is no guide to the nearly 700 pages contained in the book. Although expertly curated and engagingly introduced, without any of these additions, this is a simply a collection of reprints. There is nothing inherently wrong with that. The lack of original content may not be a problem for the scholar who studies the law of remedies and is familiar with many or most of the articles collected. For them, the convenience of having these classic articles presented in one volume may be enough to justify its place on a bookshelf. For most librarians, tasked with building and maintaining a relevant and useful collection with limited space and funds, it is not.
Meredith Rossi is circulation/reference librarian at the New York University School of Law Library.
Posted By 7/18/2012 2:30:20 PM