The AALL Spectrum
® blog is published by the American Association of Law Libraries. Submissions from AALL members and other members of the legal community are highly encouraged. Opinions and editorial views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the official position of AALL. AALL does not assume any responsibility for statements advanced by contributors. Previously, the AALL Spectrum
Blog was located at aallspectrum.wordpress.com
The AALL Spectrum blog is no longer published. Previous posts are archived on this page.
11/6/2014 5:33:29 PM
HeinOnline World Treaty Library Evaluation
Ultimately, we decided to get the World Treaty Library because:
- It allows you to search across a huge database of U.S. & non-U.S. treaties and related secondary sources
- Since we already had Core Plus United Nations collection, the initial subscription fee was very reasonable (and the annual access charge is $0, that means free in perpetuity).
These are my findings based on my personal evaluation of the content and the feedback from other librarians.
Although there is some duplication of the content with libraries that Hein already has such as the UN Law Collection and U.S. Treaties and Agreements Library, spot checking the list of included titles, I found that the duplicative materials seemed to be a fairly small portion of all of the documents offered in the World Treaty Collection, making it well worth the cost to add this module if you already had the others. In other words the discount provided if you already have some of the content more than compensates for the duplicative content in my somewhat intuitive opinion. Moreover, since you can search only within the World Treaty Collection for treaties (even if they originally appeared in U.S. Treaties and Agreements or only in the UN Law Collection) you win in two ways:
- You (and your patrons) save time when searching both because you don’t have to figure out in advance which of the three Collections you should search and if you are searching by topic, you do not have to search multiple collections.
- You do not have to search all of HeinOnline and then weed out the many irrelevant results, you can be sure that all the results you get in the World Treaty Library will be treaty related.
Another reason that we chose to get this is that it is the most comprehensive collection of Treaty materials currently available (as far as I know). Most of the major treaty sources are represented in some way. Included are:
Although the Consolidated Treaty Series is not specifically listed on the document outlining the contents, according to their marketing flyer, HeinOnline’s Historical Treaty Index, “Contains all early treaties included in Clive Parry’s Consolidated Treaty Series. The index from the series was used to identify the full text and CTS original cite for each bilateral and multilateral treaty.” This means they have all of the content that the Consolidated Treaty Series has.
As an added bonus, the World Treaty Library search page, also has links to outside sources such as FLARE Index to Treaties and various Treaty Research Guides from top schools like Princeton University and Harvard Law School.
One thing that may be a bit confusing is that there are two ways to search this Library. You can search the Treaty Index, and if you search this way, there are many treaty related search fields that you can use. If you search All Titles, remember this includes secondary as well as primary sources, then there are only 3 search fields, Text, Title and Creator/Author.
Overall, this makes treaty research so much easier, that I will need to update Vanderbilt’s Treaty Research Guide to reflect that HeinOnline has solved the problem of having to search one place for treaties to which the U.S. is a party and another for non-U.S. treaties.
 As pointed out to me by a law library professional who would like to remain anonymous.
© C. Deane
Reference/Foreign and International Law Librarian/Lecturer in Law
Alyne Queener Massey Law Library
Posted By 11/6/2014 5:33:29 PM
11/6/2014 4:49:14 PM
Gender and Sexuality in Information Studies Colloquium Recap
In mid-October I attended the Gender and Sexuality in Information Studies Colloquium at the University of Toronto. Papers were selected from proposals submitted in May of 2014. The conference was subject-specific and had an information science focus. I found it to be an excellent opportunity to connect with librarians practicing in non-legal areas, yet sharing a common interest. It was a great way to learn about new things and get a feel for other areas of the profession.
"Queering Order" Panel. Left to Right: Melodie Fox, Cait McKinney, D. Grant Campbell, & Melissa Adler.
The conference included presentations on a number of different subjects: web-based communities, internet filtration, archives, name authority records, Library of Congress subject headings, pornography, academic libraries, collections development, and art exhibits. All the works addressed gender or sexuality in some way. Two presentations focused on legal information as a key component, though many others also raised interesting legal questions. Melodie Fox, a doctoral candidate at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee iSchool provided and excellent analysis of legal classifications of sex and gender compared with gender classification in different editions of the Dewey Decimal System. My presentation focused on difficulties in researching asexuality in legal research databases and the resulting social justice implications.
In addition, inherent in several of the non-legal presentations were issues such as intellectual property protection for transient materials, harassment in digital creation spaces, and archiving hate crime material.
The conference was an excellent opportunity to learn about the roles that different individuals play in addressing contemporary library issues. “There were 100 attendees. [One attendee reporting on the conference estimated] that library and information studies professors and PhD students made up 50%, library school grad students made up 25%, and the other 25%. . .were practitioners, who work almost exclusively in academic settings.” Tara Robertson’s Blog. Attendance was higher than expected, but still small enough for presenters and attendees to meet and engage in discussion with individuals from institutions all over the continent.
A compilation of articles edited and compiled by the organizers of the conference, the Feminist and Queer Information Studies Reader, is available for those seeking more information on Gender and Sexuality in the library and information profession. In addition, many of the works presented at the conference will likely be published in the coming years.
© AJ Blechner, 2014. Reference/Outreach Librarian, University of Miami Law Library, Coral Gables, Florida. firstname.lastname@example.org.
Posted By 11/6/2014 4:49:14 PM
10/30/2014 8:53:32 AM
Knowledge management is a trending topic within the law library world. What exactly is knowledge management or KM? I would describe KM as the connection of your users to the right resources through use of a shared database where knowledge is used collaboratively among a particular community. According to Law Librarianship in the Digital Age, KM is: “The leveraging of the organization’s collective wisdom (know-how) by creating systems and processes to support and facilitate the identification, capture, dissemination and use of the organization’s knowledge to meet its business objectives” (Lastres & MacLeod 390).
Why does KM matter? KM is currently being used within law firms as a way of collecting and sharing knowledge. Sharing knowledge can help facilitate client relationships, collaboration among IT, marketing, attorneys, librarians and more. KM will also secure valuable information for the future as attorneys retire and pass down their forms, templates and experience to newer attorneys within their firm.
While KM can be highly useful, it does come with its own set of challenges. One of the hardest obstacles law firms need to overcome is attaining attorney buy-in. As we know, attorneys are busy and may not have the time needed to dedicate to knowledge management.
This presents a unique opportunity for librarians. Law librarians can use this as a chance to extend their services to include knowledge management. Currently, most firms engaging in KM are using SharePoint in order to develop collaboration sites for their various practice area teams. Librarians can become involved by creating research guides for attorneys to place on their site. This is another way of the library becoming a service and not a space, reaching their users in yet another platform. With this step into the KM door can come more opportunities for librarians, whether it be developing deeper relationships with attorneys who then might become comfortable asking for more help with research or other pieces of the KM puzzle.
Not only can KM be used within a law firm, but also within a law school or government law library. KM would be highly useful to implement at the reference desk in tracking statistics and previous questions and resources used in those interactions. Therefore, while there may be a few obstacles to overcome in developing KM within your institution, the benefits and possibilities are endless.
I am happy to share that I was hired as a Knowledge Management Analyst/Reference Librarian at a top law firm and have helped to develop a collaboration site for nearly every practice area team we have. It’s been a great experience and I cannot wait to see what the future holds for KM within our firm.
Posted By 10/30/2014 8:53:32 AM